Skip to content
Solange DeschatresOct 1, 2026, 2:00:01 AM16 min read

Future CMO Spotlight: Infoblox's Joe Dotson on the New Rules of B2B Demand Generation (Part 1)

Future CMO Spotlight: Infoblox's Joe Dotson on the New Rules of B2B Demand Generation (Part 1)
18:37

Future CMO Spotlight, Part 1: Infoblox's Joe Dotson on the New Rules of B2B Demand Generation

The Infoblox marketing leader on real demand signals, AI agents, skeptical buyers and building programs that compound.

Joe Dotson has built his marketing career close to the point where strategy meets revenue. He is Senior Director, EMEA Marketing, Infoblox, and was named to HotTopics' 2026 Future B2B CMO 100. Dotson brings a field marketing perspective grounded in commercial accountability, sales partnership and regional execution.

In Part 1 of this Future CMO Spotlight conversation with Energize Marketing's Solange Deschatres, Dotson focuses on the mechanics of modern demand generation: how to distinguish activity from true demand, rethink the meaning of a lead, use AI to scale follow-up, build credibility with skeptical cybersecurity buyers and design regional programs that keep creating value after the initial interaction.

Note: The Future CMO Spotlight features leaders named to HotTopics' Future B2B CMO 100. Joe Dotson is not a CMO.

From Field Marketing to the CMO Mindset

Energize Marketing: You've said field marketers should behave like 'mini CMOs.' How has field marketing prepared you for a future CMO role, and where might it not prepare you?

Joe Dotson: My role is Senior Director, EMEA Marketing, but field marketing has been great preparation for thinking like a CMO. I'm sure there are things you could never be fully prepared for when you get into that big seat, but my career in field marketing has served as an excellent training ground. One of the main things field marketing does is force you to be commercially minded. You're really in lockstep with the sales organization. That's not only understanding their priorities at a high level, but also understanding their funnel, their pipeline coverage and how you're going to help support that. When you get to the CMO level, you have to think at a much higher level and be super commercially minded, and that's one of the main areas field marketing has prepared me for.

It also gives you the ability to build relationships and have a view across other parts of the business. Field marketing forces you to step back, realize other people's priorities and focus your strategy around what they need to be successful. If they're successful, my team and I are successful.

Another phrase I say to my team is that you're kind of the glue, but more than that, you're the galvanising force. There are other disciplines within marketing that we work very closely with, and they're the experts in digital marketing, brand, creative, social and other specialties. It's my job and my team's job to think holistically about what the region needs then galvanise those specialists around it so the region succeeds. Being a field marketing manager is similar to being a CMO in that it's not always about being the person doing everything. It's about understanding the strategy, working with sales to develop it, then working with the village around you to be successful as one team.

Energize: If you were building a B2B demand generation organization from scratch today, how would you design it differently from the way teams were built in the past?

Joe Dotson: In the age of AI, we're going to stop seeing so many people doing individual tasks. Ten years ago in marketing, you might have one person who looked after just email, one person who looked after search and so on. As the years have gone on, those specialties have evolved and come together, and I think that's going to continue.

As businesses look to get the most from their people, I think roles will broaden. Specialists and field marketers alike will develop additional skills, and AI will make that possible, letting teams take on more and spend their time on higher-value work.

Redefining Demand, Leads and Follow-Up

Energize: B2B marketers are very good at measuring activity. How should we distinguish measurable activity from actual demand?

Joe Dotson: It's about where we are now versus where we're going. Tools are developing so fast in terms of attribution and what you can track. In the last five years it's gone leaps and bounds, and I think it will continue. What our marketing operations and analytics teams are able to track and pull together is incredible, and it's only going to get better.

But as a rule, I think anything a buyer can do in three seconds, whether that's opening an email, downloading a guide, or registering for an event and not turning up, is going to start to be seen as not necessarily demand, but more of a high-level lead. Demand is going to be when behavior changes. Maybe they start bringing a colleague to an event or a next call, or they reach out and ask for a one-to-one meeting. Their behavior moves from research into actually taking action.

It will be interesting to see how tools develop because that differentiation would be very useful for sales. You'll be able to see people in two buckets: people who are still researching, which 6sense and tools like that already help us see, versus people who are starting to act on that research. As marketers, we need to capture people at the right time when that behavior starts to change and adjust our content and programs accordingly.

Energize: You've said that 10,000 people at a booth means very little if only two meetings come from it. How should marketers rethink the idea of a lead?

JD: When I first started in marketing, I remember the level of success from an event was how many scans you had. Then eventually it became about the quality of the scans. In today's marketing, that's not a level of success. I would quite happily go to a trade show and have 20 scans if 10 of those were meetings and we knew five were going to have follow-up. To me, that's a good result. If we had 200 scans but nothing else was following on from it, sales isn't going to be interested and I'm not interested. I'm here to drive pipeline and commercial outcomes.

I also think we're moving toward a model that's not just about targeting individuals, but about becoming more multithreaded. For a trade show, ideally you'd have a couple of people in an account you start to connect with. You may also have a digital program where you're connecting with those same people and other people from the organization. Over time, it's the marketer's job to target the different key decision-makers in an account, maximising key stakeholder buy-in, before it gets in front of them from a contract perspective.

Our marketing strategy needs to allow for that multithreading. We need to work with sales to understand who the key personas are, and if they don't know, help discover them. Then we need to talk to the different people in the same account with messaging that's relevant to them. I think that's where we need to get to as an industry.

Energize: What makes field marketing follow-up effective?

JD: Ask my team and they'll tell you I talk about follow-up constantly, because it's the most important thing. If you're not talking about follow-up before the event or activity is even planned, you're missing a huge trick. If you don't know what you're doing with those leads once they come in and how you're converting them, it's already too late because those leads are going cold.

You need to understand the interaction you've had with each contact, who they are and their personas. What's the follow-up? Is it an email? Is it the BDR organization? Are there some accounts that should be followed up directly by the account manager? What's the messaging? What's the call to action? Are you inviting them to a security workshop, another event, trying to get a meeting, or handing them over to our digital nurture programs?

Working with my team, we've created an agent that helps us do that. That's where AI really comes in and helps amplify your marketing. Something that would have taken hours, if not a day, going through leads after an event can start to categorize them into hot leads, warm leads and a nurture list, and recommend the messaging and the right approach based on value-selling methods. My team runs around 350 activities on average a year across eight field marketing managers. This allows them to scale and still keep granularity in the follow-up. We think about it in advance, have calls in the diary before any activity happens, and use AI to speed up the process while keeping pace with everything.

Energize: What data does your AI agent use to prioritize and tailor post-event follow-up?

JD: The team adds event notes and lead context, and the agent brings together CRM, intent and event data into one view. That lets it look at the broader engagement context and help categorize follow-up based on the information we already have.

Without the agent, it would have taken the team hours and hours to get to that kind of detail themselves, if they could get to it at all, because it's in so many different systems. The agent combines it into one view. Then we sit down with our BDRs and sales organization, run through it as one team, and go off and do the follow-up process.

AI as Operational Leverage

Energize: How should marketing leaders help teams adopt AI without overwhelming or reducing AI to a content tool?

JD: There's a mix when it comes to AI and marketing. Part of it is experimentation, and I encourage anyone to roll their sleeves up and have a play with it. I've taught myself because I'm interested in it. The more you play with it, the more you understand it.

But I also think it's the responsibility of leaders. It's not just a case of guiding people on how to use AI. It's also about giving them tools, like agents, that allow them to get the power of AI without feeling overwhelmed by what to do with it. We've tried to create a series of agents that look holistically at the entire field marketing role, from planning to pre-activity, during the activity and post-activity. We ask what the stages are and what agents we can fit in to automate, empower and uplevel what we're doing.

JD: Otherwise, you're at risk of just saying, “AI is important. Go do it.” Then people may just use it for email and content. I think that's the trap some people could get into.

Energize: How can organizations move from a broad ‘we need to use AI” mandate to practical adoption?

JD: We've been very lucky at Infoblox. Leadership has been very good in terms of making AI a mandate, but we've also been given environments to explore it. Certain Wednesdays every month are dedicated to exploring, understanding and self-teaching. We also did an offsite recently where everyone was split into teams, given a task and had to use AI in different ways to achieve it.

It’s hands-on learning. This is going to be a journey everyone is on. Some people are earlier in their journey than others, and I think you need to give people the space to build it up in their own time while also helping them see results at work. We've been fortunate to have leadership with the foresight to do that for quite a while.

Earning Credibility With Cybersecurity Buyers

Energize: Cybersecurity buyers are skeptical and technically sophisticated. How do you generate demand with an audience that is quick to challenge marketing claims?

JD: In all my experience in B2B marketing, cybersecurity buyers have a very well-tuned marketing detector. They will question things very quickly: Is that stat true? Is that claim true? You have to be very confident in your data and make sure what you're saying is the truth, not marketing fluff.

You have to be honest, and if you say something, you have to make sure you can back it up. That's something Infoblox takes seriously. At Infoblox, we have an incredible threat intelligence team and the research they come out with gives credibility and power to the rest of our marketing because we have stats and information behind it. Having the data and strong content to back you up is one of the key pieces. You're not just making claims without evidence. You have evidence to support what you're saying. That helps you have a credible conversation, opens doors and helps get the sales team in front of the right people.

Energize: How are you using that data to get in front of buyers?

JD: In multiple ways. We have research reports, from commissioned studies to our threat intelligence team's research, that other parts of the business put out and that we promote. We have annual reports. We have press releases when we find individual pieces of threat intelligence. And even something as simple as putting it on the stand can make you stand out from the crowd.

I said this about a year and a half ago: You could take the logos off half the stands at an event and you wouldn't be able to tell the difference, other than the color. We have a few really powerful and compelling stats that we always put on our stands, and they always seem to draw attention. That works well.

Energize: How do you create demand among buyers who aren't yet budgeted or category-ready?

JD: I think it comes back to creating demand in general. There's a misconception that people turn up with their checkbooks ready to be opened. That's very rare. It's our job, and the sales organization's job, to create that demand and that reason to buy. One of the key ways to do that is focusing on a value sell. It's not about the product. It's about the value you're trying to get across to the market and the pain you're trying to solve.

If the pain you're addressing is important to solve, and you have that conversation based on value, you're more likely to convert or persuade someone. Most of the time, there's budget. It just hasn't been allocated to what you're trying to sell.

It's about getting across that what they're trying to buy over here isn't going to solve the problem they're trying to address, and showing that we're the people who can help solve it. That's a consultative, value-led approach versus coming in and saying, “Please buy product A and product B because we're the best.” As an industry, we've moved on from that in general, although you still see it.

People also need to realize it's not an overnight conversation. If the budget is allocated somewhere else, you need time to persuade them. That's where multithreading becomes even more important. If you persuade person A and they go to all the other people involved in the decision, it's likely to be dismissed if the rest aren't bought in. You need to take all of them on that value journey. By the time you get to budgets and money, you're months down the line and they already understand the value you're going to bring. Especially in security, they'll find the budget when they understand why what you're offering is essential to their business.

Global Consistency, Local Relevance and Compounding Events

Energize: Across EMEA, how do you decide what should remain globally consistent and what needs to be localized?

JD: The argument, the proof points, the visual system, the brand and the positioning should be consistent. I don't think those need to be regenerated in every country. That's your brand and your message, and it should resonate across every market in general.

Where you become more local is the format you go to market with, the proof, the channel, the person delivering it and the timing. If you think about Riyadh and Frankfurt, they're going to want very different things from the same afternoon. Especially with events, you want to create an experience that's relevant to the people in the room while keeping the core story consistent. There might be nuances in terms of local legislation or stats relevant to the local market, but the foundation is the same everywhere.

Energize: What separates an event program that creates temporary engagement from one that compounds over time?

JD: I think it's the value of the content you're presenting, and it depends on the type of event. When you're talking about a large event series, that sounds more like a flagship series. To me, that means you're selling the vision of the company, what you're trying to achieve, where you believe the market should go and how organizations should set themselves up. The important thing is that you don't talk about product during that time. You talk about value. What's the story you want to tell? Why should people think it's important?

But the main thing, again, is follow-up. What's the follow-up strategy? That's how the people attending your event translate into real opportunities. You hope people turning up on the day is enough to turn into a meeting and an opportunity, but a lot of the time that's not the case. So what's your strategy around that? You've sold them the vision and the dream. People are excited. How do you then take them into digital, other programs, other events or partner activity?

You need to work with sales leadership from the beginning to understand what the next plan is. That's what moves it from a one-day activity to a compounding activity where, a year later, you're still seeing pipeline flow through from it.

Where Demand Generation Is Heading

Across the first half of the conversation, Dotson returns to a consistent idea: modern demand generation is less about producing more activity and more about understanding what buyer behavior means, acting on it with the right context and creating a deliberate path to what happens next. AI can help teams do that at greater scale, but the strategy still starts with value, credibility and disciplined follow-up.

In Part 2, the conversation shifts from how demand is created to how marketing should be led. Dotson discusses what changes when sales and marketing share commercial accountability, how to navigate longer buying cycles and larger buying groups, why B2B still needs creativity, and what the next generation of CMOs will need to understand about how the business makes money.

COMMENTS

RELATED ARTICLES